After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these systems. From lie diagnosis tools tested at the border to a system for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being used by asylum applications. This article is exploring how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to browse these devices and to go after their legal right for proper protection.
It also demonstrates how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from accessing the programs of security. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects so, who are regimented by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these systems have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double effect: www.ascella-llc.com although they assist with expedite the asylum method, they also help to make it difficult just for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.
